Mechanisms are choices

The same goal can travel by different routes.

A guarantee names a public outcome. The toolbox asks which institution should act, with what authority, funding, enforcement, feedback, and room for correction.

  1. 01 Public principle
  2. 02 Measurable goal
  3. 03 Policy mechanism
  4. 04 Responsible institution
  5. 05 Funding and enforcement
  6. 06 Observed result
  7. 07 Revision

Sixteen tools

What each tool does—and what it needs

No mechanism is inherently sufficient. Each changes authority, incentives, administration, and the distribution of risk.

Direct public provision

A public institution directly provides a service or infrastructure.

May work well when: the service has natural-monopoly features, universal access matters, or private supply is predictably thin

Common limits: poor management, politicized allocation, inflexible procurement, or weak feedback

Requires: capital, staff, operating budgets, service standards, appeals, and oversight

Example areas: schools, libraries, water systems, public health

Related guarantees: Education, Infrastructure, Health

Social insurance

People contribute to a pooled system that pays defined benefits when covered risks occur.

May work well when: risks are broad, predictable in a population, and difficult for individuals to bear alone

Common limits: solvency pressure, eligibility boundaries, payroll effects, administrative error

Requires: a contribution base, benefit rules, reserves or financing, records, and adjudication

Example areas: retirement, disability, unemployment, health coverage

Related guarantees: Life’s risks, Health, Care

Tax credits

The tax system reduces liability or makes payments for qualifying expenses or conditions.

May work well when: eligibility can be measured through tax administration and recipients can use flexible assistance

Common limits: delay, complexity, non-filer exclusion, fraud, and help that does not create supply

Requires: clear eligibility, refundability decisions, data matching, and accessible filing

Example areas: family support, education, housing, work incentives

Related guarantees: Care, Housing, Education

Grants

A government funds states, localities, institutions, households, or projects for a defined purpose.

May work well when: local variation matters and outcomes can be specified without one national delivery model

Common limits: fragmentation, compliance burden, weak evaluation, or inequitable grant-writing capacity

Requires: fair allocation, monitoring, technical support, and renewal rules

Example areas: infrastructure, training, housing construction, climate resilience

Related guarantees: Infrastructure, Housing, Education

Regulation

Public rules set minimum duties, prohibited practices, standards, or market conditions.

May work well when: harm can be defined and prevented more efficiently than repaired case by case

Common limits: capture, outdated rules, compliance burden, evasion, or barriers to entry

Requires: legal authority, expertise, inspection, adjudication, and revision

Example areas: workplace safety, privacy, utilities, product standards

Related guarantees: Work, Digital rights, Environment

Enforcement

Investigators, inspectors, prosecutors, or private actions make existing rules meaningful.

May work well when: violations are detectable and remedies deter harm or make people whole

Common limits: underfunding, selective enforcement, delay, excessive discretion, and procedural unfairness

Requires: evidence, staffing, due process, penalties, remedies, and public reporting

Example areas: wage theft, fraud, civil rights, pollution

Related guarantees: Work, Citizenship, Consumers

Public options

A publicly administered option competes alongside private providers or plans.

May work well when: choice is weak, exit is costly, or a benchmark can discipline price and quality

Common limits: adverse selection, cross-subsidy, political pricing, and unclear competitive neutrality

Requires: transparent financing, eligibility, governance, capacity, and comparable reporting

Example areas: insurance, banking, broadband, retirement savings

Related guarantees: Health, Markets, Infrastructure

Procurement

Public purchasing conditions can shape product, labor, competition, security, and disclosure practices.

May work well when: government purchasing is large enough to set credible standards without closing markets

Common limits: favoritism, complexity, incumbent advantage, and goals unrelated to delivery

Requires: open competition, auditability, contract management, and remedy for bidders

Example areas: clean vehicles, labor standards, cybersecurity, small-business access

Related guarantees: Markets, Work, Environment

Antitrust and competition

Law and institutions constrain monopoly conduct and preserve competitive opportunity.

May work well when: entry, choice, bargaining power, and innovation are harmed by conduct or structure

Common limits: slow litigation, uncertain remedies, market-definition disputes, and overdeterrence

Requires: economic and legal capacity, merger review, remedies, and sector knowledge

Example areas: platforms, agriculture, health care, payments

Related guarantees: Fair markets, Digital rights, Work

Labor standards

Minimum rules protect pay, time, safety, classification, and equal treatment.

May work well when: workers cannot realistically negotiate essential terms one by one

Common limits: evasion, reduced hours or hiring, one-size rules, and weak enforcement

Requires: clear scope, records, enforcement, worker voice, and adjustment for context

Example areas: minimum pay, leave, scheduling, safety

Related guarantees: Good work, Care, Life’s risks

Collective bargaining

Workers negotiate terms through representative institutions rather than only individual contracts.

May work well when: workplace-specific knowledge and countervailing power improve voice and agreement

Common limits: conflict, representation disputes, rigidity, and unequal coverage

Requires: organizing rights, good-faith process, enforceable agreements, and democratic governance

Example areas: pay, benefits, training, technology at work

Related guarantees: Good work, Citizenship, Digital rights

State and local experimentation

Subnational governments test rules, services, and institutions suited to local authority and conditions.

May work well when: variation can reveal better designs and national uniformity is unnecessary

Common limits: unequal rights by ZIP code, spillovers, weak evaluation, and capacity gaps

Requires: baseline rights, transparent measures, learning networks, and fiscal support

Example areas: zoning, elections, utilities, care delivery

Related guarantees: Housing, Democracy, Infrastructure

Infrastructure investment

Long-lived public or regulated assets expand capacity and resilience.

May work well when: supply constraints or network effects cannot be solved with household assistance alone

Common limits: cost overruns, siting conflicts, delay, displacement, and maintenance neglect

Requires: planning, permits, finance, labor, community input, and lifecycle maintenance

Example areas: housing-enabling systems, grid, transit, broadband

Related guarantees: Environment, Housing, Markets

Disclosure and transparency

People and oversight bodies receive comparable information about price, risk, ownership, performance, or influence.

May work well when: information can change choice or enable enforcement without dictating a result

Common limits: information overload, strategic compliance, privacy harm, and weak remedies

Requires: standard definitions, accessible presentation, audit, privacy, and consequences for false statements

Example areas: fees, campaign money, algorithmic notices, product risk

Related guarantees: Consumers, Democracy, Markets

Default rules

A system selects a protective starting choice while preserving meaningful ability to opt out.

May work well when: inaction is common and the default can improve outcomes without eliminating choice

Common limits: paternalism, bad defaults, difficult exit, and manipulation by the rule designer

Requires: evidence, easy exit, notice, periodic review, and attention to distribution

Example areas: retirement enrollment, privacy, renewal, benefit enrollment

Related guarantees: Life’s risks, Digital rights, Work

Private and nonprofit institutions

Businesses, unions, cooperatives, charities, mutuals, and community groups provide services, organize voice, and create alternatives.

May work well when: plural institutions have knowledge, trust, capital, or innovative capacity the state lacks

Common limits: uneven access, mission drift, monopoly, discrimination, and accountability gaps

Requires: fair rules, transparency, governance, competition, and public backstops where needed

Example areas: cooperative housing, clinics, training, mutual insurance

Related guarantees: All guarantees

Before choosing

Questions for mechanism design

  • Is the problem lack of money, lack of supply, power imbalance, information failure, discrimination, coordination, or several at once?
  • Which level of government or institution has the authority and operational knowledge?
  • What behavior will households, firms, workers, investors, and administrators change in response?
  • Who can appeal an error, through what process, and before what harm occurs?
  • Which costs are visible and which are merely shifted to another ledger?

After implementation

Questions for revision

  • Did access improve for the intended people and places?
  • What happened to quality, price, supply, choice, work, investment, and administrative burden?
  • Were benefits and costs distributed as expected?
  • Did fraud, capture, evasion, or civil-liberties harms emerge?
  • Should the tool be expanded, narrowed, redesigned, combined with another mechanism, or ended?

Apply the toolbox

See options inside every guarantee.

Each page separates the outcome from specific bills and shows multiple institutional paths.

Explore the guarantees